HTTP/2 200 date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 14:07:35 GMT content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 vary: Accept-Encoding set-cookie: PHPSESSID=dak4okl2ficqc2hj4mgn3lutj5; path=/ expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT cache-control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate pragma: no-cache x-pingback: https://ambcrypto.com/xmlrpc.php link: ; rel="https://api.w.org/" link: ; rel="alternate"; type="application/json" link: ; rel=shortlink cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC expect-ct: max-age=604800, report-uri="https://report-uri.cloudflare.com/cdn-cgi/beacon/expect-ct" report-to: {"endpoints":[{"url":"https:\/\/a.nel.cloudflare.com\/report\/v3?s=aP9eb3Wkjk3eVkn%2FtTuQG4Xh2NXCrcHFQsxtv3AfpS479PRBPqrjbMBX6DjHOtNGF74kHtBIXdE%2BuYvfhcM2Is8IMHxh6nZHYBxdtZoaAESys%2BOiCSkBou4tEG0%2BeRfs"}],"group":"cf-nel","max_age":604800} nel: {"success_fraction":0,"report_to":"cf-nel","max_age":604800} server: cloudflare cf-ray: 681c3051aa3a597f-IAD alt-svc: h3-27=":443"; ma=86400, h3-28=":443"; ma=86400, h3-29=":443"; ma=86400, h3=":443"; ma=86400 XRP lawsuit: SEC files letter opposing 'in part' Ripple's motion to seal - AMBCrypto

“More fundamentally, Ripple’s Motion to Seal is at odds with the Lugosch presumption of access by the public to the judicial function in the context of this case.”Curiously, while Ripple requested a seal on the exhibits of both parties, the SEC did not want everything to be hidden. Instead, the plaintiff is opposing the defendant’s motion “only in part.” This puzzled some in the community, with one user tweeting[3],
“The issue I have with this is why